THE TRESSURE

The tre ure is really an orle gemel, i.e. an orle divided into two narrow ones set closely together, the one inside the other. It is, however, usually depicted a trifle nearer the edge of the escutcheon than the orle is generally placed. The tre ure cannot be borne singly, as it would then be an orle, but plain tre ures under the name of "concentric orles" will be found mentioned in Papworth. In that Ordinary eight instances are given of arms containing more than a single orle, though the eight instances are plainly varieties of only four coats. Two concentric orles would certainly be a tre ure, save that perhaps they would be drawn of rather too great a width for the term "tre ure" to be properly applied to them. A Complete Guide to Heraldry IMG:855465476085164071_fig228.png:Fig. 228. Fig. 228. —Tre ure flory and counter-flory. If these instances be disregarded, and I am inclined to doubt them as genuine coats, there certainly is no example of a plain tre ure in British heraldry, and one's attention must be directed to the tre ure flory and counter flory (Fig. 228), so general in Scottish heraldry. Originating entirely in the Royal escutcheon, one cannot do better than reproduce the remarks of Lyon King of Arms upon the subject from his work "Heraldry in relation to Scottish History and Art":— "William the Lion has popularly got the credit of being the first to introduce heraldic bearings into Scotland, and to have a umed the lion as his personal cognisance. The latter statement may or may not be true, but we have no trace of hereditary arms in Scotland so early as his reign (1165-1214). Certainly the lion does not appear on his seal, but it does on that of his son and succe or Alexander II., with apparent remains of the double tre ure flory counter flory, a device which is clearly seen on the seals of Alexander III. (1249-1285). We are unable to say what the reason was for the adoption of such a distinctive coat; of course, if you turn to the older writers you will find all sorts of fables on the subject. Even the sober and sensible Nisbet states that 'the lion has been carried on the armorial ensign of 143 Scotland since the first founding of the monarchy by King Fergus I.'—a very mythical personage, who is said to have flourished about 300 B.C. , though he is careful to say that he does not believe arms are as old as that period. He says, however, that it is 'without doubt' that Charlemagne entered into an alliance with Achaius, King of Scotland, and for the services of the Scots the French king added to the Scottish lion the double tre ure fleur-de-lisée to show that the former had defended the French lilies, and that therefore the latter would surround the lion and be a defence to him." All this is very pretty, but it is not history. Chalmers remarks in his "Caledonia" that the lion may po ibly have been derived from the arms of the old Earls of North umber land and Hunting don, from whom some of the Scottish kings were descended; and he mentions an old roll of arms preserved by Leland, [10] which is certainly not later than 1272, in which the arms of Scotland are blazoned as: Or, a lion gules within a bordure or fleuretté gules , which we may reasonably interpret as an early indication of what may be considered as a foreign rendering of the double tre ure. Sylvan us Morgan, one of the very maddest of the seventeenth-century heraldic writers, says that the tre ure was added to the shield of Scotland, in testimony of a league between Scotland and France, by Charles V.; but that king did not ascend the throne of France till 1364, at which time we have clear proof that the tre ure was a firmly established part of the Scottish arms. One of the earliest instances of anything approaching the tre ure in the Scottish arms which I have met with is in an armorial of Matthew Paris, which is now in the Cotton i an MSS. in the British Museum, and at one time belonged to St. Alban's Monastery. Here the arms of the King of Scotland are given as: "Or, a lion rampant flory gules in a bordure of the same." The drawing represents a lion within a bordure, the latter being pierced by ten fleurs-de-lis, their heads all looking inwards, the other end not being free, but attached to the inner margin of the shield. This, you will observe, is very like the arms I mentioned as described by Chalmers, and it may po ibly be the same volume which may have been acquired by Sir Robert Cotton. In 1471 there was a curious attempt of the Scottish Parliament to displace the tre ure. An Act was pa ed in that year, for some hitherto unexplained reason, by which it was ordained "that in tyme to cum thar suld be na double tres or about his (the king's) armys, but that he suld ber hale armys of the lyoun without ony mair." Seeing that at the time of this enactment the Scottish kings had borne the tre ure for upwards of 220 years, it is difficult to understand the cause of this procedure. Like many other Acts, however, it never seems to have 144 been carried into effect; at least I am not aware of even a solitary instance of the Scottish arms without the tre ure either at or after this period. There are other two representations of the Scottish arms in foreign armorials, to which I may briefly allude. One is in the Armorial de Gelre , a beautiful MS. in the Royal Library at Bru els, the Scottish shields in which have been figured by Mr. Stodart in his book on Scottish arms, and, more accurately, by Sir Archibald Dunbar in a paper read to the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland in 1890. The armorial is believed to be the work of Claes Heynen, Gelre Herald to the Duke of Gueldres between 1334 and 1372, with later additions by another hand. The coat a igned in it to the King of Scotland is the lion and double tre ure; the lion is uncrowned, and is armed and langued azure; above the shield is a helmet argent adorned behind with a short capelin or plain mantling, on which is emblazoned the saltire and chief of the Bruces, from which we may gather that the arms of David II. are here represented; the lining is blue, which is unusual, as mantlings are usually lined or doubled with a metal, if not with ermine. The helmet is surmounted by an Imperial crown, with a dark green bonnet spotted with red. [11] On the crown there is the crest of a lion sejant guardant gules, imperially crowned or, holding in his paw a sword upright; the tail is coué or placed between the hind-legs of the lion, but it then rises up and flourishes high above his back in a sufficiently defiant fashion. This shows that the Scottish arms were well known on the Continent of Europe nearly a hundred years before the date of the Grunenberg MS., while Virgil de Solis (c. 1555) gives a sufficiently accurate representation of the Royal shield, though the fleur-de-lis all project outwards as in the case of Grunenberg; he gives the crest as a lion rampant holding a sword in bend over his shoulder. Another ancient representation of the Scottish arms occurs in a MS. treatise on heraldry of the sixteenth century, containing the coats of some foreign sovereigns and other personages, bound up with a Scottish armorial, probably by David Lindsay, Lyon in 1568. The tre ure, like the bordure, in the case of an impalement stops at the line of impalement, as will be seen by a reference to the arms of Queen Anne after the union of the crowns of England and Scotland. It is now held, both in England and Scotland, that the tre ure flory and counter flory is, as a part of the Royal Arms, protected, and cannot be granted to any person without the expre licence of the 145 Sovereign. This, however, does not interfere with the matriculation or exemplification of it in the case of existing arms in which it occurs. Many Scottish families bear or claim to bear the Royal tre ure by reason of female descent from the Royal House, but it would seem much more probable that in most if not in all cases where it is so borne by right its origin is due rather to a gift by way of augmentation than to any supposed right of inheritance. The apparently conflicting statements of origin are not really antagonistic, inasmuch as it will be seen from many analogous English instances ( e.g. Mowbray, Manners, and Seymour) that near relationship is often the only reason to account for the grant of a Royal augmentation. As an ordinary augmentation of honour it has been frequently granted. The towns of Aberdeen and Perth obtained early the right of honouring their arms with the addition of the Royal tre ure. It appears on the still existing matrix of the burgh seal of Aberdeen, which was engraved in 1430. James V. in 1542 granted a warrant to Lyon to surround the arms of John Scot, of Thirl est ane, with the Royal tre ure, in respect of his ready services at Soutra Edge with three score and ten lances on horseback, when other nobles refused to follow their Sovereign. The grant was put on record by the grantee's descendant, Patrick, Lord Napier , and is the tre ured coat borne in the second and third quarters of the Napier arms. When the Royal tre ure is granted to the bearer of a quartered coat it is usually placed upon a bordure surrounding the quartered shield, as in the case of the arms of the Marque of Queens berry , to whom, in 1682, the Royal tre ure was granted upon a bordure or . A like arrangement is borne by the Earls of Eglinton , occurring as far back as a seal of Earl Hugh , appended to a charter of 1598. The Royal tre ure had at least twice been granted as an augmentation to the arms of foreigners. James V. granted it to Nicolas Canivet of Dieppe, secretary to John , Duke of Albany (Reg. Mag. Sig., xxiv. 263, Oct. 24, 1529). James VI. gave it to Sir Jacob Van Eiden , a Dutchman on whom he conferred the honour of knighthood. On 12th March 1762, a Royal Warrant was granted directing Lyon to add a "double tre ure counter flowered as in the Royal arms of Scotland" to the arms of Archibald , Viscount Primrose . Here the tre ure was gules , as in the Royal arms, although the field on which it was placed was vert . In a later record of the arms of Archibald , Earl of Rosebery , in 1823, this heraldic anomaly was brought to an end, and the blazon of the arms of Primrose is now: "Vert, three primroses within a double tre ure flory counter flory or." (See Stodart, "Scottish Arms," vol. i. pp. 262, 263, where mention is also made of an older 146 use of the Royal tre ure or, by " Archbald Primrose of Dalmenie, Knight and baronet, be his majesty Charles ii. create, Vert, three primroses within a double tre ure flowered counter-flowered or .") Another well-known Scottish instance in which the tre ure occurs will be found in the arms of the Marque of Ailsa (Fig. 229). Two instances are known in which the decoration of the tre ure has differed from the usual conventional fleurs-de-lis. The tre ure granted to Charles, Earl of Aboyne, has crescents without and dem i-fleurs-de-lis within, and the tre ure round the Gordon arms in the case of the Earls of Aberdeen is of thistles, roses, and fleurs-de-lis alternately. The tre ure gives way to the chief and canton, but all other ordinaries are enclosed by the tre ure, as will be seen from the arms of Lord Ailsa. IMG:855465476085164071_fig229.png:Fig. 229. Fig. 229. —Armorial bearings of Sir Archibald Kennedy, Marque of Ailsa: Argent, a chevron gules between three cro cro lets fitchée sable, all within a double tre ure flory and counter-flory of the second. Mantling gules, doubled ermine. Crest: upon a wreath of his liveries, a dolphin naiant proper. Supporters: two swans proper, beaked and membered gules. Motto: "Avise la fin." (From the painting by Mr. Graham Johnston in the Lyon Register.)