DISTURBANCE

A Law Dictionary · 1910 · p. 9
1. Any act,causing annoyance, disquiet, agitation, or derangement to another,- or interrupting his peace, or interfering with him in the pursuit of a lawful and appropriate occupation. Richardson v. State, 5 Tex. App. 472; State v. Stuth. 11 Wash. 423, 39 Pac. 665; George v. George. 47 N. H. 33; Varney v. French, 19 N. H. 233. 2. A wrong done to an Incorporeal hereditament -by hindering or disquieting the owner 1n the enjoyment of it. Finch, 187; 3 BL Comm. 235. -Disturb_ance of common. The doing any _act by which the right of another to his corn-. mon is inco=oded or diminished· as where one. who has no right of common p'uts his cattle mto the land, or where one who has a right of common puts in cattle which are not com,- rnonable, or surcharges the common; or where the owner of the land, or other person inclose11 or otherwise obstructs it. 3 BI. Codim. 237- 241,i 3 Steph.. Comm. 511, 512.-Disturbance of rra~hise. The distur?ing or incommoding e man m the lawful exercise of his franchise, whereby the profits arising from it are diminished. 3 BI. Comm. 236; 3 Steph. Comm. 510; 2 Crabb, Real Pro'p. p. 1074, § 2472a.-Distnrbance of patronage, The hindrance or obstruction of a patron from ptesenting his clerk to a benefice. 3 BI. Comm. 242; 3 Steph. Comm. 514.-Disturbance of public worship. Any acts or conduct which interfere with the peace and good order of an a embly of persons lawfully met together for relicious exercises. Lancaster v. State, 58 Ala. 398 25 Am: Rep. 625; Brown v. State, 46 Ala. i83; McElroy v. State, 25 Tex. 507.-Disturbance of tenure. In the law_ of tenure., disturbance is where a stranger, by menaces, rorce, persua• sion, or otherwise, ca1,1.ses a tenant to leave his tenancy; this disturbance of tenure is an injury to the lord for which an action will 'lie. 3 Steph. Comm. 414.-Disturbance of the peace, Interruption of the peace, quiet, and good order of a neighborhood or community,,particularly by unnece ary and distracting noises. City of St. Charles v. Meyer, 58 Mo. 89; Yokum v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 21 S. W. 191. -Di■t111"bBDoe of way•. This happens where a person who has a right of w&.7 over another'• [s. 388]
Readham'da tam maddeyi gor →