TREATMENT

In the law of divorce. Such barbarous cruelty or severity as endangers the life or health of the party to whom it is addre ed, or creates a well-founded apprehension of such danger. Whaley v. Whaley, 68 Iowa, 647, 27 N. W. 809; Wells v. Wells, 116 Iowa, 59, 89 N, W. 98; Cole v. Cole, 23 Iowa, 433; Evans v. Evans, 82 Iowa, 462, 48 N. W. 809.. 'l'he phrase commonly employed. in statutes is "cruel and inhµman treatment," from which it may be inferred that "inhumanity" is an extreme or aggravated "cruelty." Iniqui ima pax _est anteponenda;full• ti imo hello. 'l'he most unjust peace is to be preferred to the justest war. Root v. Stuyvesant, 18 Wend. (N. Y.) 257, 305. INIQUITY, In,Scotch practice. A technical expre ion applied to the decision of an inferior judge who has decided contrary to law; he 1s said to have committed iniquity. Ben. Iniquum e11t alio■ permittere, alio11 inhibere meroaturam, It is inequitable to perml.t some to trade and to prohibit others. 3 "-Inst. lSL Iniquum eat allque:aa rel ■ui ea■e,tudioem, It 1s wrong for a ·man to be a judge In hla awn eause. Branch, l'rinc.; 12 Coke, 113. [s. 632]